![]() by Ali Davis |
RachelWatch: Election Results and Plenty of GoreToday: Rachel interviews Al Gore and dissects the election spin.
Decision ‘10: Game On Rachel started us off with Tuesday’s results and the gyroscopic spinning thereof. Rachel, way out of character for a political talking head, calmly noted that the changes aren’t huge, but may be building. Apparently the far right failed to notice that scaring the bejabbers out of the locals and splitting the vote in New York’s District 23 lost them the election and increased the Democratic majority in the House. The tea party Republicans are way more focused on throwing their weight around in their own tent, and at this point it serves the Republican Party right. Thoughtful, principled Republicans, there was a point months ago — hell, years ago — when you could have demanded sanity and taken your party back. Really any of those times when people were screaming that it should be illegal to be Muslim or gay or desirous of reasonably priced health care in this country. You could have stood up, smacked down, and brought a little dignity back, but no: You kept quiet and still in the hopes of scooping up a few easy loonbat votes. So you stay there and enjoy that bed you made. Can I pull up the covers for you? I hope Representative Bachmann (R - Minnesota) doesn’t keep you awake. The most irritating thing about this Republican Purity movement is that it puts me on the same side of a political issue as Lindsey Graham. Cut it out, wingnuts. One More Thing: Dick Armey’s FreedomWorks is providing talking points to Michele Bachmann’s Run Around the Halls of Congress Actin’ All Crazy protest, and Rachel decided to help out her buddy by pointing us to a couple of intriguing articles about him. Just in case you were worried he’s not reaching his full potential as a sleazebag. (A tip of the hat to Rachel’s amazing Webmaster Will for his excellent link blog.) Decision ’09: Sticker Shock Rachel noted that as the final tallies come in, New York's Mayor Bloomberg (somehow both Republican and Independent) spent $100 million to get 557,059 votes, or about $179 and change per vote. He could theoretically have saved money by simply giving each likely voters an MP3 player with a campaign song on it. Rachel summed up the LGBT Election News, good and bad: Question 1 in Maine bummed us all out and Virginia elected an attorney general who is scary as hell. (LGBTs who live in or are traveling through Virginia, please do your part to protest by breaking Cuccinelli’s “natural laws” happily, thoroughly, and often. I’ll meet you there for the holidays.) On the upside, Washington approved the “everything but marriage” Referendum 71, Kalamazoo rocks, and the south may have elected a couple of Gayors. Also, marijuana did well, which means maybe in a few years people will freaking relax enough to let people marry who they want. “Friendly” Fire In the face of the awful news that five British soldiers were killed by an Afghan soldier — a supposed ally — at a checkpoint, Rachel welcomed recently resigned State Department official Matthew Hoh for a fascinating interview. Tragic Wand Rachel reported that the Iraqui government has spent thousands of dollars on "bomb detectors" that are somehow magically calibrated to detect, bombs, guns, ivory, and, oh dear, truffles. Up to a kilometer away, through walls and from moving planes and stuff.I hope you’ll excuse me. I have to finish work on a device I’m marketing to the Iraqi government that can totally tell when someone in the area has a crush on you. It’s Not Easy Being Green The next big Republican slowdown is on climate change legislation. And they have a point: If they can just delay action for another 10 or 15 years, it’ll all be moot. As will all other legislation. GOParadise! On that note, Rachel sat down with former Vice President Al Gore to talk about saving the planet and try to get him to dish on other Vice Presidential matters. Moment of Geek Rachel decided to give us a gentle, nonpolitical sendoff and remind us that there is good in the world. Just in case we all needed it for some reason. |
|



Facebook
Twitter
The sky is falling
OMG it's Al Gore, everybody!
Love Rachel, but wish she'd have used the same interviewing techniques that she used on Tom Ridge, and others on this hypocrite piece of shit. Energy tax today, meat tax tommorow, and hell tax toilet paper while we're at it. lol I guess, I'm not a "liberal" after all.
http://newsbusters.org/node/11149
"Progress is not an illusion, it happens, but it is slow and invariably disappointing." Orwell
Eye bags
Greetings from the former United Kingdom! (The Treaty of Lisbon has been ratified. Thus, post-democratic Federal Europe is here! Blair for (unelected!) President? I wouldn't bet against him... :( I predict dark times ahead.)
Anyway, I do not like Ms Maddow one bit, but aside from that I heartily concur with all of your points. (Nice link btw.) Incidentally, I couldn't help but notice Ms Maddow's eye bags in the Gore clip. I wonder if her conscience robbed her of a good night's sleep on eve of the taping of this despicable propaganda piece? Read my (a trained scientist) lips; man-made climate change is scientific hogwash! But don't take my word for it, do your own research! Perhaps this is as good a place as any to start?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7b-xtks0MA
Also check out the tell-all books from the infamous Club of Rome.
Here's yet another warning from across the pond.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYZkph2DfSg
The end of national sovereignty? Isn't that where I came in?
Cheerio!
PS “Folks who literally don't make sense...” You sure as hell don't make sense to me Ms Maddow! How the hell do you live with yourself?!
I never get into political
I never get into political arguments on this thread, and I haven't really read most of this anyways this time but regarding a less political thing..
her eye bags?
I guess you were just trying to be interesting and witty and don't actually believe she looks tired cus of a conscience but.. well it wasn't funny or interesting and seems a a bit pointless. I assume its because she only gets like 6 hours sleep or whatever many nights since she does much research and then there's air time and travel a lot I guess (i know she lives in Mass some of the time anyways).. so would be tired.
perhaps its just me but i think if someone is willing to read your comments then dumb sentences like that might put them off?
Having eye bags just seems an odd thing to pick someone up on. perhaps i just feel this as i had 2 hours sleep and probably eyes bags myself.
hi from the UK too anyways
________________________________
My AfterEllen/Bridget Video Game
"there's always time for a burrow..."
"We're getting fired, fired, fired, fi..
Yes
look, and yet another scientist who says it's all "hogwash". But then again, yourself and all of those other scientists, on the opposite side of Gore, are probably just some bitter, teabagging, know nothing republicans. Don't know what to tell you about the eye bags (and the NWO. I did looked into it a while back, but came to the conclusion that it was a product of some paranoid kid. Though with the bailout, swine flu, and now cap and trade, it's all slowly making a lot of sense? That's enough to make anyone paranoid anyways..) but you gotta love how it was suggested that everyone not on board this cap and trade boat, get along well with the teabaggers.
To be fair though, she did kinda touched upon Mr. Gore's major conflicts of interest in the last few minutes of the interview. And, in all fairness to Rachel's "great research" staff. Unlike Tim Phillips, Gore is investing in "national security" measures, and therefore there wasn't really a need to delve into it any further. Then of course there's that whole liberal bias thing. hmm....though I'm probably just some racist Republican that's just mad, because a black man is the president.
"Progress is not an illusion, it happens, but it is slow and invariably disappointing." Orwell
Thanks for this:
"Also, marijuana did well, which means maybe in a few years people will freaking relax enough to let people marry who they want."
It helped me laugh thru my tears.
As for climate change and who's zooming who on which side of it...
One thing that doesn't compute with me in this argument/posturing: even if man-made pollution isn't responsible for apocalyptic levels of future world destruction - isn't it a good idea to diminish it anyway? Ya know, just so we don't have to breath/bathe in the resulting muck? How is that a bad thing? Because it puts an "unfair burden" on industry? Too freakin' bad. You make a bad product with a bad (or undesirable) side effect, and you literally pay the price. That's capitalism and things "worked out in the marketplace" at it's finest.
In the meantime the almost Pavlovian response that Gore inspires in some people is pretty damn amusing.