![]() by the linster |
If money is power, these actresses are superheroesForbes’ lists of powerful women usually are fairly predictable, topped (in every sense) by Angelina Jolie.
But last week, Forbes published its annual list that reveals another side to power: ROI. And the top 10 actresses who provide the best return on a film company’s investment may surprise you. At No. 1 is Australian actress Naomi Watts.
Watts’ most recent movie, The International, was a suspenseful thriller, to be sure, but it was only a modest box office success. Watts, however, gets less than $5 million a film — and earned the studio about $44 for every $1 she was paid on her last three major movies. Second is Jennifer Connelly.
Although He’s Just Not That Into You was fairly cliché, IMO, the studio convinced its stars to take a pay cut to be in the movie. It made $177 million. Average that with Connelly’s roles in Blood Diamond and The Day the Earth Stood Still and she earns about $41 for every $1 she’s paid. Rachel McAdams of The Time Traveler’s Wife is next, earning $30 for every $1 paid.
If December’s Sherlock Holmes is as good as I hope, McAdams may earn her way to No. 1. Natalie Portman may be less of a surprise, since her Star Wars movies made a mint at the box office. But Portman herself does not command a high salary (yet) and earns $28 for every $1 she’s paid.
No. 5, Meryl Streep, draws a bigger paycheck than the other women on this list, but her movies are almost guaranteed to be hits. Mamma Mia made $610 million and Julie & Julia probably will make even more. The Mighty Meryl earns moviemakers $27 for every $1 she’s paid.
Rounding out the list:
Jennifer Aniston — $27/$1
Halle Berry — $23/$1
Cate Blanchett — $23/$1
Anne Hathaway — $23/$1
Hilary Swank — $23/$1 Happily, many of these women have played lesbian/bisexual roles — Watts in Mulholland Dr., Connelly in Higher Learning, Portman in Black Swan (if they keep the lesbian content), Streep in The Hours, Aniston on Dirt, Swank in Boys Don’t Cry — and all are LGBT friendly. And when gay friendly stars have successful careers, we get a little closer to being accepted by the rest of the world. Now, if only I could figure out how to buy a share of Meryl. What do you think of this list? What women deserve more money for their success at the box office? Who are you surprised not to see? Submitted by on October 14, 2009 - 5:00pm. |
|


V for Vendetta?
She didn't play a lesbian,
My bad
Late night fogginess strikes again. Or wishful thinking. :)
Corrected - thank you!
V for Vendetta?
Not terribly surprised actually....
Not terribly surprised actually.... I've found her off putting for ages.... Aside from the fact that Angelina Jolie maybe asks for more money to take on a role, hich would mean the film would have to do so much better in return to cover her pay, I don't think she picks (or gets chosen for) nearly as strong roles as some of the above women...
They don't say the length of any of these actresses careers (number of movies to go by) and what each actress is asking to be payed for their work?
Criteria for the list
Exactly
I guess it at least shows who are some rising stars, who will work on the cheap and with inde films, and then who have the most draw for the best parts working with great casts, etc....
(good info for some Sundance style indie film makers, and good to think that Meryl Streep and Hilary Swank can keep choosing rocking roles and be profitable which means they will continue to get more cool roles)
Jennifer Connelly, Cate
Jennifer Connelly, Cate Blanchett, Natalie Portman, Meryl Streep, Naomi Watts, Hilary Swank...
are you kidding? What an awesome list!
Natalie Portman in "V..."?
Woot!
Hahahaha, I thought the
wow...
I'm a little suprised
with you
SO much...
1) Yay for Angelina Jolie being ridiculously hot!
2) Woot for Rachel McAdams being from my hometown!!!
3) Natalie Portman is Jewish and Israeli, too! Makes me happyyyy :)
4) Halle Berry. X-Men. Need I say more? ;)
5) Cate Blanchett is a ball of pure awesome.
Don't forget
Meryl Streep playing a lesbian in "Manhattan".
And that before it was "chique" to do so...
Right!
Awesome list
Forbes
I question your logic
As a studio manager I would prefer to make 50 per cent of 100 million than 75 percent of 10 million.Any actress who brings in more money is not likely to be dumped even though she cuts more into the profits. Think for example of Julia Roberts. She had the charisma and appeal to make a film a blockbuster.
And as soon as it becomes known that these actresses make over $2o for every dollar they were paid, soon their agents will charge more for that actress.
All that aside it was great to see that my favourite actresses are not likely to be dropped in the near future.
well
It is interesting that all these women are on the skinny side, with the exception of streep of course. Oh well thats Hollywood for you
If money is power, these actresses are superheroes
It is interesting that all these women are on the skinny side, with the exception of streep of course.
http://www.tripzs.com/